Copilot
Your everyday AI companion
About 325,000 results
  1. Mill did not think that a simple quantitative calculus could be used to make moral decisions. He argued that there were "lower pleasures" that were mainly connected with immediate physical gratification and delight, and "higher pleasures" that involved delayed gratification or prior diligence.
    ebrary.net/5107/philosophy/john_stuart_mill_define…
    Mill delineates how to differentiate between higher- and lower-quality pleasures: A pleasure is of higher quality if people would choose it over a different pleasure even if it is accompanied by discomfort, and if they would not trade it for a greater amount of the other pleasure.
    www.sparknotes.com/philosophy/utilitarianism/secti…
  2. People also ask
    The 19th-century philosopher John Stuart Mill (1806–73) answers “yes.” This discussion explains why. 1. Mill’s Hedonism Mill contends that pleasure is not merely one thing that contributes to our well-being, it’s the only thing. Similarly, only pain makes us worse off. Mill thinks that a person’s life goes well for her just insofar as she is happy.
    Mill’s Distinction of Higher and Lower Pleasures Revisited1 Huei-chun Su2 Abstract The distinction between higher and lower pleasures is one of the most important features of Mill’s utilitarianism which marks the divergence of his moral theory from Bentham’s. It is also one of the most controversial parts of Mill’s utilitarianism.
    Moreover, Mill’s views on education and self-development suggest that everyone should be given the chance to cultivate the taste for higher pleasures. Hence, Mill’s approach of assessing the value of pleasures is not an elitist one in nature. It is true that some might not be able to gain access to higher pleasures even after cultivation.
    Richard Davidson, Martin Selignam, Joshua Greene, and Jonathan Cohen has made big contribution to our understanding of moral judgment. This paper suggests that it is promising to make a significant breakthrough if the study of Mill’s distinction of higher and lower pleasures can integrate similar scientific studies.
  3. Rethinking ‘Higher’ and ‘Lower’ Pleasures | Practical Ethics

  4. Mill’s Moral and Political Philosophy - Stanford Encyclopedia of ...

  5. John Stuart Mill on The Good Life: Higher-Quality Pleasures

  6. Utilitarianism Chapter 2: What Utilitarianism Is (Part 1) Summary ...

  7. Mill's Higher Pleasures and the Choice of Character

  8. Mill's Moral and Political Philosophy - Stanford Encyclopedia of …

  9. John Stuart Mill - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

  10. Mill, John Stuart: Ethics | Internet Encyclopedia of …

    WEBMill defines “utilitarianism” as the creed that considers a particular “theory of life” as the “foundation of morals” (CW 10, 210). His view of theory of life was monistic: There is one thing, and one thing only, that is intrinsically …

  11. Some results have been removed