1. The case originated in an application (no. 47287/15) against Hungary lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human ...
Nov 21, 2019 · Hungary violated Article 3 by failing to conduct an efficient and adequate assessment when applying the safe third country clause for Serbia.
“In case of expulsion to Serbia [from Hungary], those returned are in practice barred from accessing the asylum procedure and reception conditions in Serbia.
People also ask
What was the Ilias and Ahmed v Hungary case about?
What was the case of Fáber v Hungary?
What is the asylum policy in Hungary?
Dec 23, 2019 · In its judgment from 14 March 2017 the Chamber unanimously answered in positive: by holding them in the transit zone, Hungary deprived the ...
Nov 21, 2019 · Their fears of a lack of access to Serbia's asylum system or of refoulement to Greece, as expressed under Article 3, had not been enough to make ...
Nov 21, 2019 · The GC ruled that the Hungarian authorities did not act in compliance with their duty to rigorously assess the applicants' risk of inhuman and ...
Mar 20, 2017 · Therefore, the Ilias and Ahmed judgment shows very clearly that a majority of asylum-seekers in Hungary have had their rights violated by that ...
Nov 21, 2019 · ... Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary. The case concerned two asylum-seekers from Bangladesh who spent 23 days in a Hungarian border transit zone ...
Nov 24, 2019 · In the case of Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary (21.11.2019), a Grand Chamber of the ECHR inter alia found that Hungary had failed to discharge ...
Mar 14, 2017 · Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary · 1. The case originated in an application (no. · 2. The applicants were represented by Ms Barbara Pohárnok, a lawyer